罗马诺：洛杉矶FC签下孙兴慜的交易已进入最后阶段（罗马诺：洛杉矶FC引进孙兴慜的交易即将敲定）

Evaluating news requests

Using curl to fetch news requires known endpoints, but many block bots which complicates things. The user didn’t ask a specific question but posted a headline instead. I should ask a clarifying question about whether they want confirmation, more details, or a translation. I can explain that I can’t verify without reliable sources and offer to check trusted accounts. My final response should be concise, proposing whether they want me to verify this report.Clarifying transfer news

I need to explain that nothing is final until official announcements are made. There’s some context to consider regarding the MLS primary transfer window for 2026, but since it's the 2025 season, it's essential to look at past signings like Bale and Chiellini. By 2025, LAFC may need to fill a DP slot if Vela departs. I’ll respond to the user in Chinese since they typed in that language, and I should check if they want me to verify the information proactively.Verifying information cautiously

The guidelines suggest that I should ask the user for verification only when necessary. Although I could use curl to quickly query Google, it might fail. Options like ddgr and lynx aren't available either, and making network calls could take time or fail, so it’s wise to ask the user if they want verification. I should treat this as a rumor until it's official and clarify that phrases like "here we go" indicate agreements, not finalization.Clarifying the information request

I want to clarify: does the user want me to verify the news, provide additional details, or offer a background explanation? Current context is that until there’s an official announcement, even being in the final stages might change. According to Romano, only “Here we go” means the agreement is finalized. If they want verification, I can check Tottenham, LAFC, and MLS official sources, along with major media for comparison. I might also ask for a source link or screenshot for authenticity.